Legal Opinion
V.E.B. Carl Zeiss, Jena, Steelmasters, Inc. And Ercona Corporation v. Ramsey Clark, Acting Attorney General of the United States
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided November 13, 1967No. 20351PublishedCited by 76 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JUDGMENT
2Per curiam
This cause came on to be heard on the record on appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia, and was argued by counsel.
On consideration whereof it is ordered and adjudged by this Court that the order of the District Court, appealed from in this cause be, and it is hereby, affirmed for the reasons stated in Carl Zeiss Stiftung v. V. E. B. Carl Zeiss, Jena, D.D.C., 40 F.R.D. 318 (1966).
3Cases cited1 opinion
- Carl Zeiss Stiftung v. V. E. B. Carl Zeiss, JenaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1966
4Cited by76 opinions
- Nixon v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- William Jordan v. United States Department of JusticeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1978
- Sidney M. Wolfe v. Department of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1988
- Cna Financial Corporation v. Raymond J. Donovan, Secretary of LaborCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1987
- Fred B. Black, Jr. v. Sheraton Corporation of America Appeal of United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1977
71 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.