Legal Opinion
Carl Zeiss Stiftung v. V. E. B. Carl Zeiss, Jena
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided May 18, 1966No. Misc. No. 22-65PublishedCited by 246 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ROBINSON, District Judge.
The Government has moved for additional modification of a subpoena commanding the production of documents, from files in the Department of Justice, for discovery incidental to a civil case pending in the District Court for the Southern District of New York,1 to which the Government is not a party. The motion proposes the elimination from the production requirement of documents as to which a claim of executive privilege is made, and the modification of an order directing submission for in camera inspection of documents as to which the Government asserts a…
2Cases cited40 opinions
- Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- United States v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- United States v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
- Morgan v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Totten v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by246 opinions
- Mead Data Central, Inc. v. United States Department of the Air ForceCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1977
- In re Sealed CaseCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1997
- William Jordan v. United States Department of JusticeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1978
- Gary A. Soucie v. Edward E. David, Jr., Director, Office of Science and TechnologyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1971
- Federal Trade Commission v. Warner Communications Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
241 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.