Farm Fresh, Inc. v. Bucek
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
OP ALA, Justice.
The dispositive issues presented on certio-rari are: [1] Does the 85 O.S.1991 § 17(D) 1 requirement — that a trial tribunal’s deviation of more than 10% from the impairment rating by an independent court-appointed physician be specifically identified — apply to evaluation of permanent total disability? and if not [2] Is the trial tribunal’s award of permanent total disability supported by competent evidence? We answer the first question in the negative and the second in the affirmative.
I
THE ANATOMY OF LITIGATION
The claimant, Charles Bucek [claimant or Bucek], was employed as a…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Parks v. Norman Municipal HospitalSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1984
- Owings v. Pool Well ServiceSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1992
- Special Indemnity Fund v. StocktonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1982
- Lacy v. Schlumberger Well ServiceSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1992
- Special Indemnity Fund v. ChoateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1993
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Yocum v. Greenbriar Nursing HomeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2005
- MAXWELL v. SPRINT PCSSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2016
- American Airlines v. HerveySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2001
- BE & K. CONST. v. AbbottSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2002
- Phillips v. Duke Manufacturing, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1999
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.