Legal Opinion

Farm Fresh, Inc. v. Bucek

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided May 9, 1995No. 82854PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OP ALA, Justice.

The dispositive issues presented on certio-rari are: [1] Does the 85 O.S.1991 § 17(D) 1 requirement — that a trial tribunal’s deviation of more than 10% from the impairment rating by an independent court-appointed physician be specifically identified — apply to evaluation of permanent total disability? and if not [2] Is the trial tribunal’s award of permanent total disability supported by competent evidence? We answer the first question in the negative and the second in the affirmative.

I

THE ANATOMY OF LITIGATION

The claimant, Charles Bucek [claimant or Bucek], was employed as a…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Parks v. Norman Municipal HospitalSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1984
  2. Owings v. Pool Well ServiceSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1992
  3. Special Indemnity Fund v. StocktonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1982
  4. Lacy v. Schlumberger Well ServiceSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1992
  5. Special Indemnity Fund v. ChoateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1993

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Yocum v. Greenbriar Nursing HomeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2005
  2. MAXWELL v. SPRINT PCSSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2016
  3. American Airlines v. HerveySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2001
  4. BE & K. CONST. v. AbbottSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2002
  5. Phillips v. Duke Manufacturing, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1999

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API