Legal Opinion
Owings v. Pool Well Service
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided December 1, 1992No. 78197PublishedCited by 62 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KAUGER, Justice.
The issue presented concerns the standard of review applicable on appeal from a decision of the three judge review panel (panel) of the Workers’ Compensation Court. We find that a decision of the three judge review panel of the Workers’ Compensation Court may not be reversed on appeal if it is supported by any competent evidence.1 Because the record contains competent evidence supporting the panel’s decision, the order is sustained.
FACTS
The appellee, Darrel Glen Owings (Ow-ings/employee), filed a workers’ compensation claim for disability on September 18, 1990. Owings claimed…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Parks v. Norman Municipal HospitalSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1984
- City of Duncan v. BinghamSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1964
- Bostick Tank Truck Service v. NixSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1988
- LaBarge v. ZebcoSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1988
- Williams v. Vickers, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1990
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by62 opinions
- Yocum v. Greenbriar Nursing HomeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2005
- American Management Systems, Inc. v. BurnsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1995
- McSorley v. Hertz Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1994
- Garrison v. Bechtel Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1995
- Lanman v. Oklahoma County Sheriff's OfficeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1998
57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.