Yocum v. Greenbriar Nursing Home
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the CourtOpala, J.
¶ 1 The court’s certiorari grant stands confined to the single issue whether the Court of Civil Appeals (COCA) erred in its construction of the independent medical examiner (IME) statutory regime, 85 O.S.2001 § 17, 2 by elevating an IME medical assessment of compensable harm to a higher rank of probative value (for prima facie effect) than all other admissible expert opinions. We answer in the affirmative and retransfer the case to COCA for its reconsideration of all issues in a manner consistent with today’s pronouncement.
I
THE ANATOMY OF LITIGATION
¶2 Claimant’s (Yocum or claimant)…
2Cases cited56 opinions
- Davis v. AlaskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Chambers v. MississippiSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Flemming v. NestorSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Ex Parte GarlandSupreme Court of the United States · 1867
- Cummings v. MissouriSupreme Court of the United States · 1867
51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by83 opinions
- Fent v. Contingency Review BoardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2007
- Rogers v. QuikTrip Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2010
- TORRES v. SEABOARD FOODS, LLCSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2016
- LEE v. BUENOSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2016
- YOUNG v. STATION 27, INC.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2017
78 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.