Legal Opinion

Shaff v. Skahill

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided December 11, 1992No. 91-CV-1389PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SULLIVAN, Associate Judge:

Having participated in consensual, binding arbitration proceedings, appellant contends that the trial court erred by denying confirmation of the arbitrator’s award of damages in his favor in the absence of legally sufficient grounds to vacate the award. 1 We agree and, accordingly, reverse the court’s order and remand for the entry of an order confirming the arbitrator’s award.

I

Appellee entered into two contracts with appellant and Mihail Karras for renovation of two houses owned by appellee in the District of Columbia. Both contracts provided that any claims and/or…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Brandon v. HinesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1981
  2. Poire v. KaplanDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1985
  3. Celtech, Inc. v. BroumandDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1991
  4. Sindler v. BatlemanDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1980
  5. Thompson v. LeeDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1991

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Davidson v. HensenWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Davidson v. HensenWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Umana v. Swidler & Berlin, CharteredDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1995
  4. Grad v. Wetherholt GalleriesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1995
  5. Lopata v. CoyneDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1999

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API