Legal Opinion
Umana v. Swidler & Berlin, Chartered
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided December 29, 1995No. 92-CV-1088PublishedCited by 47 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RUIZ, Associate Judge:
In this appeal, John- Umana, plaintiff-appellant, asks us to review an order of the Superior Court confirming an arbitral award in favor of one of the defendants-appellees, Swidler & Berlin, Chartered. Umana also asks us to review the trial court’s order that he arbitrate his still-pending claims against the other defendants-appellees, who are individual members of the Swidler firm. We hold that the entire appeal must be dismissed for want of jurisdiction because the trial court’s orders make clear that there has been no judgment on Umana’s claims against the individual…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Pennhurst State School and Hospital v. HaldermanSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- United States v. L. A. Tucker Truck Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1952
- M. A. P. v. RyanDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1971
- Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. MacKeySupreme Court of the United States · 1956
- Webster v. FallSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by47 opinions
- Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. v. HenkelDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1997
- John Doe No. 1 v. Susan L. BurkeDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2014
- District of Columbia Metropolitan Police Department v. Fraternal Order of Police/Metropolitan Police Department Labor CommitteeDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2010
- Everett Miles v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2018
- ROSANNE L. WOODROOF v. JOSEPH F. CUNNINGHAMDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2016
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.