Legal Opinion

Davidson v. Hensen

Washington Supreme Court

Decided May 7, 1998No. 65230-9PublishedCited by 96 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

954 P.2d 1327 (1998)

135 Wash.2d 112

Samuel DAVIDSON and Elizabeth Davidson, Petitioners,

v.

Bruce HENSEN, d/b/a BLH Construction, Registration No. BLHCO* *066CJ; and ITT Hartford Insurance Company, Bond No. 21RN46485958231, Respondents.

No. 65230-9.

Supreme Court of Washington, En Banc.

Argued February 10, 1998.

Decided May 7, 1998.

Seligmann & Beckerman, Willard G. Smith, Jr., Seattle, for Petitioners.

Kathryn E. Meyers Carruthers, Bainbridge Island, for Respondents.

TALMADGE, Justice.

This case involves both the policy of Washington's arbitration act, RCW 7.04, which confers substantial finality on…

2Cases cited48 opinions

  1. Marks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  2. Marks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  3. Loving & Evans v. BlickCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
  4. Southcenter Joint Venture v. National Democratic Policy CommitteeWashington Supreme Court · 1989
  5. Tanner Electric Cooperative v. Puget Sound Power & LightWashington Supreme Court · 1996

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by96 opinions

  1. State v. ValdezWashington Supreme Court · 2009
  2. State v. ValdezWashington Supreme Court · 2009
  3. State v. PattonWashington Supreme Court · 2009
  4. International Ass'n of Fire Fighters, Local 46 v. City of EverettWashington Supreme Court · 2002
  5. Satomi Owners Ass'n v. Satomi, LLCWashington Supreme Court · 2009

91 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API