Legal Opinion
Grad v. Wetherholt Galleries
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided June 26, 1995No. 93-CV-1407PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RUIZ, Associate Judge:
Appellants, Howard and Judith Grad, asked the Superior Court to vacate an arbitration award rendered against them and in favor of appellee, Wetherholt Galleries (“Wetherholt”), on the ground that they were not parties to any arbitration agreement with Wetherholt. The Superior Court denied the application and confirmed the award, holding that the arbitrator had the authority to determine who was a party to the agreement and that, in any event, the Grads had by their failure to object agreed to submit the question to arbitration. Because the trial court erred in deferring…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- First Options of Chicago, Inc. v. KaplanSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Williams v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Hercules & Co. v. Shama Restaurant Corp.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1992
- Haynes v. KuderDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1991
- Poire v. KaplanDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1985
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Salsitz v. KreissIllinois Supreme Court · 2001
- Oehme, Van Sweden & Associates, Inc. v. Maypaul Trading & Services Ltd.District Court, District of Columbia · 2012
- JA Walker Co., Inc. v. Cambria Corp.Supreme Court of Colorado · 2007
- Lopata v. CoyneDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1999
- 2200 M STREET LLC v. MacKellDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2007
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.