Legal Opinion
Celtech, Inc. v. Broumand
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided January 11, 1991No. 90-43PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SCHWELB, Associate Judge:
Celtech, Inc. appeals from an order of the trial court denying its motion to vacate an arbitration award in favor of Broumand, its former sales representative, and granting Broumand’s motion to enforce it. The dispute arose out of the termination by Celtech of the Independent Sales Representation Agreement between the parties. Broumand claimed that he had been damaged in the amount of $39,000. Celtech denied liability and asserted that Broumand owed it $9,800 for salary or commissions advanced to Broumand but allegedly not earned. The arbitrator awarded Broumand…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- United Steelworkers v. Warrior & Gulf Navigation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
- United Steelworkers v. Enterprise Wheel & Car Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
- United Steelworkers v. American Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
- United States v. Grinnell Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Bernhardt v. Polygraphic Co. of America, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1956
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Perini Corp. v. Greate Bay Hotel & Casino, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1992
- Bragdon v. Twenty-five Twelve Associates Ltd. PartnershipDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2004
- Curry v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1995
- State v. SchreiberSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1991
- Lopata v. CoyneDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1999
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.