Legal Opinion
Sindler v. Batleman
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided June 3, 1980No. 79-75, 79-135PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PRYOR, Associate Judge:
This litigation arose out of a dispute between joint owners of certain real property utilized for rental purposes. At issue is whether an arbitrator exceeded his authority in making an Award. Finding the arbitrator’s Award was within the scope of his authority, we conclude that the trial judge did not err in denying the motion to vacate the Award. 1 We, therefore, affirm.
In June 1965, Abraham Sindler and Joseph Batleman entered into a Joint Venture Agreement, as tenants in common of property owned in the District of Columbia (herein referred to as High View Agreement),…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- United Steelworkers v. Warrior & Gulf Navigation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
- United Steelworkers v. Enterprise Wheel & Car Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Textile Workers v. Lincoln Mills of Ala.Supreme Court of the United States · 1957
- United Steelworkers v. American Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Washington-Baltimore Newspaper Guild, Local 35 v. The Washington Post CompanyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1971
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Hercules & Co. v. Shama Restaurant Corp.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1992
- Benefits Communication Corp. v. KlieforthDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1994
- Brandon v. HinesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1981
- Poire v. KaplanDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1985
- McMullin v. Union Land & Management Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1991
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.