Legal Opinion
Pacific Finance Corp. v. Hendley
California Court of Appeal
Decided January 16, 1932No. Docket No. 4420PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PARKER, J., pro tem.
—This is a controversy between appellant corporation and defendant Valley Investment Company. The last-named corporation is an association composed of respondent Guy C. Foulks and one Elliott.
This same ease .was previously before the court and the full report thereof appears in 103 Cal. App., at page 335 et seq. [284 Pac. 736]. A reference thereto will suffice as a statement of facts. It will be observed from a reading of the report that the former judgment was reversed and the cause came back for further proceedings. On the second trial, the only evidence introduced was…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Allen v. St. Louis BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
- Blodgett v. RheinschildCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1922
- Oakland Bank of Savings v. California Pressed Brick Co.California Supreme Court · 1920
- Carter v. RowleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1922
- Pacific Finance Corp. v. HendleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Crestline Mobile Homes Manufacturing Co. v. Pacific Finance Corp.California Supreme Court · 1960
- Graddon v. KnightCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
- Commercial Credit Co. v. Barney Motor Co.California Supreme Court · 1938
- Gostin v. State Farm InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
- In Re ThomasUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. California · 1989
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.