Taylor Rogers v. Davis
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtScheNCK, J.
In the Supreme Court tbe appellants demurred ore Lenus and moved to dismiss the proceeding for want of jurisdiction, for that the proceeding was instituted before the clerk of the Superior Court, whereas such proceeding should have been instituted before the board of county commissioners. We are constrained to sustain the demurrer and grant the motion.
This proceeding was instituted in accord with section 1, chapter 448, Public Laws 1931, amending Article 13, chapter 70, of the Consolidated Statutes (being 3835 N. C. Code of 1935), which provides that proceedings to establish cartways over the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Rodgers v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1902
- School Commissioners v. Board of Aldermen & TreasurerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1912
- Cecil v. City of High PointSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1914
- Bramham v. City of DurhamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1916
- Felmet v. . CommissionersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1923
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Bland v. City of WilmingtonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
- Town of Grimesland v. City of WashingtonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
- Merrell v. JenkinsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
- Freeman v. . Comrs. of MadisonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
- Waldroup v. . FergusonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1938
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.