Legal Opinion

Town of Grimesland v. City of Washington

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided September 19, 1951No. 18PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Devuñt, C. J.

The right of the Town of Grimesland to construct and maintain an electric system for the distribution and sale of electric current to consumers beyond its corporate limits, and to own and operate transmission lines for that purpose along the highway or over and upon rights of way acquired, is not questioned in this action. G.S. 160-255. But this legislative authority would not be regarded as conferring the right to exclude competition in the territory served. Having the right to engage in this business gives no exclusive franchise, and if from lawful competition its business be…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Tennessee Electric Power Co. v. Tennessee Valley AuthoritySupreme Court of the United States · 1939
  2. Alabama Power Co. v. IckesSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  3. Rhodes v. City of AshevilleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
  4. Millar v. Town of WilsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
  5. Holmes v. City of FayettevilleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1929

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Evans v. Housing Auth. of City of RaleighSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2004
  2. Domestic Electric Service, Inc. v. City of Rocky MountSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
  3. Estate of Williams ex rel. Overton v. Pasquotank County Parks & Recreation DepartmentSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2012
  4. Lumbee River Electric Membership Corp. v. City of FayettevilleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
  5. Rice v. City of LumbertonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API