Legal Opinion

Bland v. City of Wilmington

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided May 12, 1971No. 63PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SHARP, Justice.

Plaintiffs’ assignments of error raise two questions: (1) Have plaintiffs stated a controversy justiciable under the Declaratory Judgment Act? (2) If so, may the City of Wilmington require its firemen to reside within the city limits?

The Declaratory Judgment Act permits any person affected by a statute or municipal ordinance to obtain a declaration of his rights thereunder. G.S. 1-254. Courts of record within their respective jurisdictions are expressly empowered to declare such rights even though no further relief is or could be claimed, and no proceeding is “open to objection…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. McIntyre v. ClarksonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
  2. Little v. Wachovia Bank and Trust CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
  3. Hobbs v. County of MooreSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
  4. Victory Cab Co. v. City of CharlotteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
  5. State v. HordSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Smith v. StateSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
  2. State v. ElamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
  3. Kaplan v. Prolife Action League of GreensboroCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1993
  4. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Hospital Authority v. North Carolina Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1994
  5. Plemmer v. MatthewsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API