School Commissioners v. Board of Aldermen & Treasurer
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Appeal from Lyon, J., at January Term, 1912, of MecicleN-BURG. Civil action, instituted by School Commissioners of the City of Charlotte to compel the board of aldermen and treasurer of said city to turn over to treasurer of the school board the proceeds arising from the sale of certain school bonds issued by the city of Charlotte under and by virtue of chapter 317, Private Laws 1911. On the hearing, judgment was rendered in manner and form as follows: This cause coming on…
Read the full summary
Appeal from Lyon, J., at January Term, 1912, of MecicleN-BURG. Civil action, instituted by School Commissioners of the City of Charlotte to compel the board of aldermen and treasurer of said city to turn over to treasurer of the school board the proceeds arising from the sale of certain school bonds issued by the city of Charlotte under and by virtue of chapter 317, Private Laws 1911. On the hearing, judgment was rendered in manner and form as follows: This cause coming on to be heard pursuant to the summons issued therein, and the court having heard and considered the pleadings in the cause…
1Opinion of the Court
Hoxe, J\
Chapter 317, Private Laws 1911, conferred upon the Board of Aldermen of the City of Charlotte the power, on approval of the popular vote, to issue bonds for various purposes, not to exceed, in the aggregate, the sum of $1,065,000, and specified that a portion of these bonds, not to exceed in amount the sum of $100,000, should be known as “school bonds” and to be used for the purpose of purchasing lands for schools and of building schoolhouses for the graded schools of the city. The act also providing “that moneys arising from the sale of the bonds” should be used for no other purpose…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Dahnke v. PeopleIllinois Supreme Court · 1897
- In Re Applicants for LicenseSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1906
- Kearney v. . VannSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1911
- Ewbank v. Turner.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1903
- Stockett v. Bird's Adm'rCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1862
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by40 opinions
- Lawrence Baking Co. v. Unemployment Compensation CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1944
- In Re SteelmanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1941
- Person v. . WattsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1922
- Chaisson v. SimpsonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2009
- Person v. Board of State Tax CommissionersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1922
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.