Felmet v. . Commissioners

Tbe plaintiff claims that tbe bonds are illegal, for two reasons: (1) That chapter 722, Public-Local Laws 1915, is inconsistent with tbe general school law (chapter 136, Laws 1923), and that tbe latter repeals chapter 722 aforesaid, and, therefore, the bonds issued pursuant to said special act would be void. (2) The plaintiff also contends that said chapter 722 aforesaid is contrary to Article Till, section 4, of the Constitution.

There is no controversy as to the facts. There is no allegation in the complaint that chapter 722 has not been complied with. When two acts' covering the same…