Legal Opinion
Garnette v. Mankel
California Court of Appeal
Decided November 27, 1945No. Civ. 7162PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtPeek, J.
This is an action by appellant, J. L. Garnette, against respondent Carl Mankel, for the wrongful conversion of a power shovel. From the judgment denying the relief sought he has appealed.
The record discloses that one Charles Hopper Brown was the lessee of certain mining property in Placer County, California. He executed a sublease to one D. D. Pettigrew, who entered upon the premises and conducted the business of mining chrome ore, under the name of War Metals Development, Ltd., a limited copartnership. Said sublease provided in part: “Should Second Party [Pettigrew] desire to cease and…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Austin v. Hallmark Oil Co.California Supreme Court · 1943
- Hendy v. DinkerhoffCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880
- Tatterson v. KehrleinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927
- Randall v. California Land Buyers SyndicateCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933
- Hemmeon v. Amalgamated Copper Mines Co.California Court of Appeal · 1928
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Steroid Hormone Product CasesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
- Schulze v. SchulzeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
- Burlington Northern R. Co., Inc. v. ScheidNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1986
- EAC Credit Corp. v. BassCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
- Lewis v. WainscottCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.