Legal Opinion
Steroid Hormone Product Cases
California Court of Appeal
Decided February 8, 2010No. B211968PublishedCited by 74 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
WILLHITE, J.
—This class action case is one of several coordinated cases involving over-the-counter sales of products containing anabolic steroids. The named plaintiff in this case, Diego Martinez, alleged causes of action against defendant General Nutrition Companies, Inc. (GNC), for violation of the unfair competition law (Bus. & Prof. Code, § 17200 et seq.) (UCL) and the Consumers Legal Remedies Act (Civ. Code, § 1750 et seq.) (CLRA), based upon GNC’s sale of products that contained androstenediol, a substance defined as a schedule III controlled substance under California law.…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- In Re Tobacco II CasesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2009
- Engalla v. Permanente Medical Group, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1997
- Vasquez v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- Linder v. Thrifty Oil Co.California Supreme Court · 2000
- Sav-On Drug Stores, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by74 opinions
- Antonio Hinojos v. Kohl's CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
- Stearns v. Ticketmaster Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- Dino Rikos v. The Procter & Gamble Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2015
- Avritt v. Reliastar Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2010
- Ries v. Arizona Beverages USA LLCDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2012
69 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.