Legal Opinion

Burlington Northern R. Co., Inc. v. Scheid

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided December 16, 1986No. Civ. 11269PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ERICKSTAD, Chief Justice.

Burlington Northern appealed from a summary judgment dismissing its suit against the Scheids for damages caused by the Scheids' removal and sale of railroad tracks and switches on land owned by the Scheids and the Scheids’ refusal to allow Burlington Northern to remove tracks remaining on the Scheids’ land. We reverse and remand.

In 1944 the Northern Pacific Railway Company, Burlington Northern’s predecessor, entered into an agreement with the Truax-Traer Coal Company pursuant to which railroad tracks were constructed on land owned by Truax-Traer. The tracks were…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Billy Robicheaux v. Radcliff Material, Inc., a Subsidiary of Southern Industries CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1983
  2. Albers v. NoDak Racing Club, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Lawrence J. Duriso, Cross-Appellant v. K-Mart No. 4195, Division of S. S. Kresge Company, Defendant- Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1977
  4. Farmers Elevator Company v. DavidNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1975
  5. Glatt v. Bank of Kirkwood PlazaNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1986

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Ray E. Friedman & Co. v. JenkinsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1987
  2. Brigham Oil & Gas, L.P. v. Lario Oil & Gas Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2011
  3. Williston Cooperative Credit Union v. FossumNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1988
  4. Schmidt v. First National Bank & Trust Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1990
  5. Bohle v. ThompsonCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1989

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API