Legal Opinion

Miller v. Billingsly

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 15, 1873PublishedCited by 49 opinions

APPEAL from the Dearborn Common Pleas.

1Opinion of the CourtBuskirk, J.

—This was an action by the appellee against the appellant for money had and received.

The only valid assignment of error is based upon the refusal of the court to grant a new trial.

The facts, as proved upon the trial, are these: Baily G. Hayes, in 1869, gave to the appellant a draft upon a firm in Cincinnati, Ohio, for either one thousand or eleven hundred dollars, and directed him, when he received the money, to pay to Baily Hayes one hundred dollars, to Hayden Miller one hundred dollars, to the appellee five hundred dollars, and the balance he was to have as a loan. The appellant, upon…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Potter v. SmithIndiana Supreme Court · 1871
  2. Frenzel v. MillerIndiana Supreme Court · 1871
  3. Davis v. CallowayIndiana Supreme Court · 1868
  4. Bird v. LaniusIndiana Supreme Court · 1856
  5. Day v. PattersonIndiana Supreme Court · 1862

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by49 opinions

  1. City of South Bend v. TurnerIndiana Supreme Court · 1901
  2. Ransdel v. MooreIndiana Supreme Court · 1899
  3. Caress v. FosterIndiana Supreme Court · 1878
  4. Mathonican v. Scott & BaldwinTexas Supreme Court · 1894
  5. Durham v. BischofIndiana Supreme Court · 1874

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API