Legal Opinion

Scanlin v. Stewart

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 16, 1894No. 16,853PublishedCited by 37 opinions

Prom the Shelby Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtMcCabe, J.

This was a suit by the appellee William P. Stewart against the appellant, as principal, and the *575appellee George W. Gram, as surety, on a promissory note, and seeking a foreclosure of a vendor's lien as against Scanlin.

The appellee Crum, as such surety, filed a cross-complaint against his codefendant, appellee Stewart, and appellant, Scanlin, showing that he had paid the debt and asking to be subrogated to the rights of Stewart.

Appellee Lux was admitted as a party defendant by the court, and a demurrer by Scanlin to the cross-complaint of Lux was overruled.

The assignment of errors calls in…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Bayless v. GlennIndiana Supreme Court · 1880
  2. Lindley v. KelleyIndiana Supreme Court · 1873
  3. Teal v. SpanglerIndiana Supreme Court · 1880
  4. Martin v. CaubleIndiana Supreme Court · 1880
  5. Berlin v. OglesbeeIndiana Supreme Court · 1879

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. Ray v. BakerIndiana Supreme Court · 1905
  2. Smith v. Wells Manufacturing Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1897
  3. Goodrich v. StanglandIndiana Supreme Court · 1900
  4. Runner v. ScottIndiana Supreme Court · 1898
  5. Taylor v. CanadayIndiana Supreme Court · 1900

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API