Legal Opinion
Ross v. Banta
Indiana Supreme Court
Decided September 26, 1893No. 16,570PublishedCited by 37 opinions
Prom the Cass Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the CourtMcCabe, C. J.
— Appellee sued the appellants in the court below to recover possession of lots 5 and 6 in D. D. Dykeman’s first addition to Logansport, Cass county, Indiana. Issue, trial by the court, special finding, conclusions of law and judgment thereon for appellee.
This was the second trial of the cause. On the first trial, the appellants recovered judgment. A new trialas a matter of right under the statute was granted the appellee, resulting in a judgment, as above stated, in his favor.
There are twenty assignments of error by appellants, and nine assignments of cross-error by the appellee. Many of…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Marine Ins. Co. of Alexandria v. HodgsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1813
- Embry v. PalmerSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
- Sims v. City of FrankfortIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
- Hendrickson v. HinckleySupreme Court of the United States · 1855
- Pearce v. OlneySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1850
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by37 opinions
- Anderson v. AndersonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1979
- Smith v. Wells Manufacturing Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1897
- Hall v. Indiana Department of State RevenueIndiana Court of Appeals · 1976
- Livingston v. LivingstonIndiana Supreme Court · 1921
- Runner v. ScottIndiana Supreme Court · 1898
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.