Legal Opinion

Rose v. Webster

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided March 23, 1981No. 78-7832, CA 16832PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtThornton, J.

This is an action for forcible entry and detainer. ORS 105.105.

Plaintiffs appeal from a judgment for defendants on their counterclaim which declares that defendants and their successors in interest have an irrevocable license to use a tideland area, currently under lease to plaintiffs by the State of Oregon, for the purpose of maintaining thereon that portion of their marina and moorage facility which extends onto plaintiffs’ property. Plaintiffs assign as error:

1) the "finding” that the parties had an oral lease agreement covering the tideland area in question and that defendants had not…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Farley v. UNITED PACIFIC INSURANCE COMPANYOregon Supreme Court · 1974
  2. State Ex Rel. State Land Board v. Corvallis Sand & Gravel Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Fry v. DH Overmyer Co., Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1974
  4. Brusco Towboat Co. v. State Ex Rel. State Land BoardOregon Supreme Court · 1978
  5. Brown v. EoffOregon Supreme Court · 1975

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Hill v. OlandCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1982
  2. Shisler v. Fireman's Fund InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1987
  3. Hill v. OlandCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1982
  4. Hill v. OlandCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API