Legal Opinion

Brown v. Eoff

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided January 7, 1975PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtO’Connell, C. J.

This is a suit in equity to establish plaintiffs’ right to use a roadway across defendants’ land for access to plaintiffs’ warehouse. The trial court found that plaintiffs possess an irrevocable license and awarded damages for payments made by plaintiffs to defendants to prevent interference with access. The defendants appeal, seeking- to have the matter tried anew on the record. ①

The record reveals that during the latter part of 1967, plaintiff and defendant ② began negotiating for the purchase by plaintiffs from defendants of approximately two acres situated at the corner of Madison and…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Dressler v. IsaacsOregon Supreme Court · 1959
  2. Hallock v. SuitorOregon Supreme Court · 1900
  3. Heisley v. EastmanOregon Supreme Court · 1921
  4. Shepard Et Ux. v. PurvineOregon Supreme Court · 1952

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. S.O.C., Inc. v. Mirage Casino-HotelNevada Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Brusco Towboat Co. v. State Ex Rel. State Land BoardOregon Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Pfaendler v. BruceCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2004
  4. Twin City Fire Insurance Co., Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross-Appellant v. Philadelphia Life Insurance Co., and Rask & Associates, Defendants-Appellants-Cross-Appellees. Rask & Associates, Third-Party v. John L. Griffith, Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1986
  5. Corey v. United Savings Bank, MutualCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1981

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API