Legal Opinion
Farley v. UNITED PACIFIC INSURANCE COMPANY
Oregon Supreme Court
Decided September 6, 1974PublishedCited by 32 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHolman, J.
Plaintiff brought an action upon a contract to insure a crane against damage or loss. The action had two counts: the first on an oral binder to insure the crane, and the second on a written policy of insurance. The case was tried by the court without a jury, and judgment was entered for plaintiff. Defendant appealed.
As is proper after a verdict for plaintiff, the facts will be stated in the most favorable manner to plaintiff which the evidence will justify. Plaintiff purchased a crane which was situated in mountainous terrain. He intended to bring it to Portland for repair and desired to…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Gould Morris Electric Co. v. Atlantic Fire Insurance Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1948
- Stinemeyer v. Wesco Farms, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1971
- Colorado Life Co. v. TeagueCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1938
- Baker v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance CompanyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1968
- Reed v. Commercial InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1967
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- Celtic Life Insurance Co. v. CoatsTexas Supreme Court · 1994
- Abercrombie v. Hayden Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1994
- Lee v. USAA Casualty InsuranceMontana Supreme Court · 2001
- Kabban v. MacKinCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1990
- Allstate Insurance v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1984
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.