Legal Opinion

Hill v. Oland

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided December 22, 1982No. 78-0088; CA A22905PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*87WARDEN, J.

Plaintiffs, buyers, appeal from the decree of the trial court denying specific performance of a contract for the sale of land owned by defendants as tenants by the entirety. The negotiations of the parties resulted in a document signed by plaintiffs and defendant Gene Oland only on April 21, 1977. Plaintiffs’ complaint alleged that defendants were partners in the subdivision and sale of the property and that Gene Oland acted on behalf of the partnership in the entering into the contract. We affirm.

The facts are disputed. The following is a brief summary as we find the facts de novo.…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Hayes v. KillingerOregon Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Young v. NEILLOregon Supreme Court · 1950
  3. Marshall v. WilsonOregon Supreme Court · 1944
  4. Farley v. UNITED PACIFIC INSURANCE COMPANYOregon Supreme Court · 1974
  5. Stone-Fox, Inc. v. Vandehey Development Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1981

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Livingston v. METROPOLITAN PEDIATRICS, LLCCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2010
  2. Oregon Southwest, LLC v. KvaternikCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2007
  3. Shaw v. Delta Airlines, Inc.District Court, D. Nevada · 1992
  4. Smith v. EllisonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2000
  5. Shisler v. Fireman's Fund InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1987

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API