Houghton v. Kern Valley Bank
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtSloss, J.
This action was brought to obtain a partition of a number of lots situate in the city of Bakersfield, Kern County. Pending the action Ng Hon Kim filed a complaint in-intervention whereby he claimed, as against all the original' parties, the title to a portion of the property described in the complaint, to wit: lots 1, 2, and 3 in block 132 in the Baker-Homestead Tract. The plaintiff and the various defendants, answered the complaint in intervention, denying the intervener’s claim of title. The court found that said intervener was the owner of the lots claimed by him, and gave him a decree…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Baird v. MonroeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
- Best v. WohlfordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
- Jackson ex dem. Schaick v. DavisNew York Supreme Court · 1825
- Keane v. CannovanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1863
- Miller v. WilliamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- McKevitt v. City of SacramentoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921
- Guthrie v. HaunOregon Supreme Court · 1938
- Thompson v. McKennaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1913
- Broome v. BroomeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
- McLauchlan v. BonyngeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1911
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.