Legal Opinion

Hayes v. Emerson

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 16, 1930No. Docket Nos. 3941, 3942PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MR. JUSTICE Pro Tem. TUTTLE Delivered the Opinion of the Court.

These are actions brought to recover damages on account of personal injuries received in an automobile collision. The two actions were consolidated and tried together. In each case the jury brought in a verdict for plaintiff against appellant only, and this appeal is taken from the judgments so rendered.

The plaintiffs were passengers in the automobile of defendant Fairfield, and the collision occurred at the intersection of two streets in the city of Roseville. Reversal of the judgments is sought upon the following grounds:…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Benjamin v. NoonanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
  2. Scragg v. SalleeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1914
  3. Fawkes v. ReynoldsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
  4. Gray v. EschenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
  5. Finkelstein v. CosgroveCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Olson v. MeachamCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
  2. Anello v. Southern Pacific Co.California Court of Appeal · 1959
  3. Barone v. JonesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
  4. Greeneich v. Southern Pacific Co.California Court of Appeal · 1961
  5. Hilferty v. MickelsNebraska Supreme Court · 1960

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API