Legal Opinion

People v. Ribolsi

California Supreme Court

Decided June 18, 1891No. 20785PublishedCited by 17 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of the city and county of San Francisco, and from an order denying a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

Foote, C.

— The defendant was convicted of feloniously receiving and buying stolen goods for his own gain and profit, and to prevent the owner thereof from again possessing them, under section 496 of the Penal Code..From the judgment rendered against him, and an order refusing a new trial, he has taken this appeal.

He contends that the information on which he was tried was obnoxious to a demurrer he filed thereto, in the respects that it does not give the particular circumstances of the offense charged, and that it is not direct and certain as to such offense; that it does not set forth the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. People v. CloughCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
  2. People v. MizeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
  3. People v. BushtonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
  4. People v. HenryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
  5. People v. GordonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. State v. ChapinOregon Supreme Court · 1914
  2. State v. RogersIdaho Supreme Court · 1917
  3. Capshaw v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1987
  4. People v. OsborneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
  5. People v. ClausenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API