Legal Opinion

People v. Clough

California Supreme Court

Decided September 10, 1887No. 20258PublishedCited by 114 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Tulare County, and from an order refusing a new trial.- The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtMcICinstby, J.

The defendant Clough was convicted of burglary of the first degree.

As portion of his charge, the judge of the Superior Court instructed the jury, in the precise language of section 1111 of the Penal Code, as follows:—

“A conviction cannot be had on the testimony of a *349accomplice, unless he is corroborated by other evidence, which in itself, and without the aid of the testimony of the accomplice, tends to connect the defendant with the commission of the offense; and the corroboration is not sufficient if it merely shows the commission of the offense or the circumstances thereof”; and in another…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Stocking v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1855
  2. People v. CostelloCourt for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · 1845
  3. People v. MelvaneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1870
  4. State v. StebbinsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1861
  5. Dick v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1872

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by114 opinions

  1. People v. CoffeyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
  2. People v. NegraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
  3. People v. DavisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930
  4. Malachi v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1889
  5. People v. McLeanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890

109 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API