Legal Opinion

People v. Mize

California Supreme Court

Decided July 31, 1889No. 20521PublishedCited by 71 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the, Superior Court of Sonoma County, and from an order refusing a new trial, The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtPaterson, J.

The court instructed the jury, among other things, as follows: “ Gentlemen of the. jury, these defendants are charged before you by this information with making an assault upon Henry Coffey, with intent to murder the said Coffey. They cannot be convicted of an assault to commit murder unless the evidence shows, beyond a reasonable doubt, that had the prosecuting witness, Henry Coffey, been killed, defendants-would have been guilty of murder. If the testimony shows that had Henry Coffey been killed, one of the defendants would have been guilty of murder, then that one should be convicted. If…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. People v. TurnerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1884
  2. People v. Cheong Foon ArkCalifornia Supreme Court · 1882
  3. People v. KeeferCalifornia Supreme Court · 1861
  4. State v. EvansSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1887

3Cited by71 opinions

  1. People v. MurtishawCalifornia Supreme Court · 1981
  2. People v. CollieCalifornia Supreme Court · 1981
  3. People v. BlandCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002
  4. People v. SwainCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996
  5. People v. MillerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935

66 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API