Legal Opinion

Capshaw v. State

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided May 28, 1987No. 86-59PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THOMAS, Justice.

Does § 6-3-403(a)(i), W.S.1977, Cum.Supp.1985, which proscribes buying, receiving, concealing or disposing of property with the knowledge, belief or reasonable cause to believe that it was obtained in violation of law, encompass an element of specific intent? This is the essential issue to be resolved in this appeal. Gary Cap-shaw also contends that there was insufficient evidence to sustain his conviction. The district court ruled that specific intent was not an element of this crime and refused to give proffered instructions with respect to specific intent. It also denied…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. People v. HoodCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
  2. Scadden v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1987
  3. State v. BittingSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1971
  4. People v. MartinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
  5. Broom v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1985

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Baum v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Griffin v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Johnston v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1987
  4. Stone v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1987
  5. Ivan Lee Sweets, Sr. v. The State of WyomingWyoming Supreme Court · 2013

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API