Legal Opinion

People v. Bushton

California Supreme Court

Decided August 5, 1889No. 20517PublishedCited by 69 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of San Luis Obispo County, and from an order denying a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. .

1Opinion of the CourtWorks, J.

The defendant was charged with the crime of murder, and tried and convicted of manslaughter. His motion for a new trial was denied, and he appeals.

It is contended that the court below erred “in allowing purported testimony of the prosecuting witness, Hernandez, given at the coroner’s inquest, to be read in the presence and hearing of the jury, and in allowing the coroner to give evidence of the purported testimony given before him by Hernandez on that occasion, and that it erred in not striking out such evidence as hearsay.” The evidence referred to was introduced for the purpose of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. People v. Hong Ah DuckCalifornia Supreme Court · 1882
  2. People v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1881
  3. People v. LangtonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1885

3Cited by69 opinions

  1. People v. TewksburyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  2. People v. MowerCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002
  3. People v. RiosCalifornia Supreme Court · 2000
  4. People v. ScottCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  5. People v. PowellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891

64 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API