Legal Opinion
Arcara v. Moresse
New York Court of Appeals
Decided January 5, 1932PublishedCited by 70 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtKellogg, J.
The plaintiffs in these actions were occupants of a c.ar with which an automobile owned by the defendant came into collision. There was evidence that the collision was occasioned by the negligence of the driver of the defendant’s car. The resulting damage to each plaintiff was stipulated, and motions for a directed verdict were made by counsel for the opposing parties. Thereupon the court directed verdicts in favor of the plaintiffs against the defendant owner for the amounts stipulated.
It is conceded that, prior to the collision, the defendant owner had loaned his car to Maggio, his nephew,…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Psota v. Long Island R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1927
- Grant v. KnepperNew York Court of Appeals · 1927
- Geiss v. Twin City Taxicab Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1913
- Chaika v. VandenbergNew York Court of Appeals · 1929
- Witherstine v. Employers' Liability Assurance Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1923
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by70 opinions
- Leotta v. PlessingerNew York Court of Appeals · 1960
- Motor Vehicle Accident Indemnification Corp. v. Continental National American Group Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1974
- Hinchey v. SellersNew York Court of Appeals · 1959
- Hughes v. QuackenbushCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
- Hardware Mutual Casualty v. SameCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1942
65 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.