Legal Opinion

Chaika v. Vandenberg

New York Court of Appeals

Decided November 19, 1929PublishedCited by 51 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLehman, J.

The plaintiff was struck and injured in the city of New York by an automobile owned by the defendant and operated at the time of the accident by the defendant’s son. The evidence sufficiently shows that the injuries were the result solely of the negligence of the operator of the car. The defendant claimed that at the time of the accident his son was not operating his car in his business nor with his permission and that he was, therefore, not responsible for any negligence of his son.

At the trial the parties stipulated that they would waive a jury and “ that the court may direct a verdict with…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Ferris v. . SterlingNew York Court of Appeals · 1915
  2. Psota v. Long Island R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1927
  3. Potts v. . PardeeNew York Court of Appeals · 1917
  4. Fluegel v. CoudertNew York Court of Appeals · 1927
  5. Moore v. . RosenmondNew York Court of Appeals · 1924

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by51 opinions

  1. Leotta v. PlessingerNew York Court of Appeals · 1960
  2. Motor Vehicle Accident Indemnification Corp. v. Continental National American Group Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1974
  3. St. Andrassy v. MooneyNew York Court of Appeals · 1933
  4. Arcara v. MoresseNew York Court of Appeals · 1932
  5. Hinds v. John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1959

46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API