Legal Opinion

Pinto Unemployment Compensation Case

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 10, 1951No. Appeal, 37PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam,

Appellant was denied unemployment compensation by the Unemployment Compensation Board of Review which affirmed the order of disallowance of the referee. The question is whether the evidence supports the Board’s finding that appellant was disqualified under section 401 (d) of the Unemployment Compensation Law of December 5, 1936, P. L. (1937) 2897, as amended, 43 PS §801 (d).

Appellant was employed by Stern’s, Seventh and Market Streets, Philadelphia, until December 31, 1949, when her employment was terminated by the employer. On March 15, 1950, appellant was referred to Yetta’s…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Sturdevant Unemployment Compensation CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1945
  2. Mattey v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1948
  3. Weiland Unemployment Compensation CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1950

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Penn Hills School District v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  2. Chickey v. Commonwealth, Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  3. Molnar v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  4. Tokar v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  5. Majoris Unemployment Compensation CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1960

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API