Legal Opinion

Molnar v. Commonwealth

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided February 20, 1979No. Appeal, No. 1241 C.D. 1977PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge Mencer,

Robert N. Molnar (claimant) appeals from a decision of the Unemployment Compensation Board of Review (Board) that he is not able and available for *520suitable work and therefore is ineligible for benefits pursuant to Section 401(d) of the Unemployment Compensation Law, Act of December 5, 1936, Second Ex. Sess., P.L. (1937) 2897, as amended, 43 P.S. §801(d). We affirm.

Claimant suffers from allergies which are aggravated by exposure to dust, smoke, fumes, and particulate matter. His condition became so severe that his physician advised him to leave his employment with the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Waters v. New Amsterdam Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1958
  2. Pinto Unemployment Compensation CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
  3. Koba v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  4. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review of the Commonwealth v. PatsyCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  5. Tokar v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1978

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Rohde v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
  2. Pennsylvania Electric Co. v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  3. Galla v. Commonwealth, Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  4. Scardina v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  5. Wincek v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1982

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API