Legal Opinion

Weiland Unemployment Compensation Case

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 14, 1950No. Appeal, No. 115PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Reno, J.,

In this unemployment compensation case the board refused appellant’s claim for benefits because she was not available for and failed to accept suitable work.

The undisputed facts are: Claimant had been employed for six years prior to January 7, 1949, when she was laid off for lack of work. Her job was that of packing crayons by hand for shipment. She worked four and one-half days per week. She is married and lives in Easton with her parents. Her husband is a lieutenant in the New York Fire Department where he maintains two small rooms. He works approximately two days and is…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Mattey v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1948
  2. Brilhart Unemployment Compensation CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1946
  3. Mee's Bakery, Inc. v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1947
  4. D'Yantone Unemployment Compensation CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1946
  5. Lavely v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1948

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Peter J. Mascaro Co. v. MilonasSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1960
  2. Pinto Unemployment Compensation CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
  3. Czarlinsky v. Employment Security AgencyIdaho Supreme Court · 1964
  4. D'Amato Unemployment Compensation CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1961
  5. Barley v. Maryland Department of Employment SecurityCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1966

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API