Legal Opinion
Tokar v. Commonwealth
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
Decided May 8, 1978No. Appeal, No. 125 C.D. 1977PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Judge Mencer,
Linda Ann Tokar (claimant) appeals from a decision of a referee and the Unemployment Compensation Board of Review (Board) that she is unavailable for suitable work within the meaning of Section 401 (d) of the Unemployment Compensation Law (Act), Act of December 5,1936, Second Ex. Sess., P.L. (1937) 2897, as amended, 43 P.S. §801 (d), and therefore ineligible for unemployment compensation benefits. The referee and the Board believed that a claimant who is on a leave of absence must automatically be deemed unavailable for suitable work.1 We remand for factual…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Sturdevant Unemployment Compensation CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1945
- Myers v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
- Pinto Unemployment Compensation CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
- Chickey v. Commonwealth, Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
- Erie Resistor Corp. v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1953
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Penn Hills School District v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
- Davis v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
- Molnar v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
- Harwood v. UN. COMP. BD. OF REV.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
- Ortiz v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.