Palmer v. Borg-Warner Corp.
Alaska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
*633OPINION
BURKE, Justice.
The issue presented on appeal is whether the superior court properly granted summary judgment in favor of Borg-Warner, an airplane engine component manufacturer, based on its conclusion that the two-year statute of limitations, AS 09.55.580(a), barred a wrongful death claim brought by the estate of a passenger killed in an airplane crash. Specifically, we must decide whether the personal representatives of the estate had notice of a potential claim against Borg-Warner more than two years before filing their complaint. We conclude, as did the superior court, that the…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Pocono International Raceway, Inc. v. Pocono Produce, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
- Zeman v. Lufthansa German AirlinesAlaska Supreme Court · 1985
- Gudenau & Co., Inc. v. Sweeney Ins., Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1987
- Hanebuth v. Bell Helicopter InternationalAlaska Supreme Court · 1984
- Greater Area Inc. v. BookmanAlaska Supreme Court · 1982
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- John's Heating Service v. LambAlaska Supreme Court · 2002
- Pedersen v. ZielskiAlaska Supreme Court · 1991
- Gefre v. Davis Wright Tremaine, LLPAlaska Supreme Court · 2013
- Cameron v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1991
- Hiltz v. Robert W. Horn, P.C.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1996
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.