Legal Opinion

Hiltz v. Robert W. Horn, P.C.

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided January 23, 1996No. 95-110PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MACY, Justice.

Appellant Richard Hiltz appeals from the summary judgment which was entered in favor of Appellees Robert W. Horn, P.C. and Robert Horn, individually. The district judge found that Hiltz’s claims were barred by the statute of limitations, that no genuine issue as to any material fact existed, and that the appellees were entitled to have a judgment as a matter of law.

We affirm.

ISSUES

Hiltz presents the following issues for our review:

1. Did the district court err in concluding that Wyoming has declined to adopt the continuing representation doctrine for legal malpractice actions?

2.…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Schoenrock v. TappeSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Muller v. SturmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981
  3. Mills v. GarlowWyoming Supreme Court · 1989
  4. Stuckey v. State Ex Rel. Wyoming Worker's Compensation DivisionWyoming Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Hawk Ex Rel. Jensen v. Union Pacific RailroadWyoming Supreme Court · 1992

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. R.D.H. Communications, Ltd. v. WinstonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1997
  2. Bevan Ex Rel. Bevan v. FixWyoming Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Adelizzi v. StrattonWyoming Supreme Court · 2010
  4. Robert L. Kroenlein Trust ex rel. Alden v. KirchheferWyoming Supreme Court · 2015
  5. Woodard v. Cook Ford Sales, Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1996

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API