Vaandering v. Rosenblum
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtKistler, J.
Two sets of petitioners seek review of the certified ballot title for Initiative Petition 69 (2016) (IP 69). See ORS 250.085(2) (specifying requirements for seeking review of certified ballot titles). We review the ballot title to determine whether it substantially complies with ORS 250.035(2). See id. (stating standard of review). For the reasons explained below, we refer the ballot title to the Attorney General for modification.
IP 69, if enacted, would alter the rights and obligations that public employers, their employees, and the unions representing those employees owe each other under…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Abood v. Detroit Board of EducationSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Davenport v. Washington Education Ass'nSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Rasmussen v. KrogerOregon Supreme Court · 2011
- Lavey v. KrogerOregon Supreme Court · 2011
- Wolf v. MyersOregon Supreme Court · 2007
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Busch v. McInnis Waste Systems, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 2020
- Cross v. RosenblumOregon Supreme Court · 2016
- Lutz v. RosenblumOregon Supreme Court · 2018
- Vaandering v. RosenblumOregon Supreme Court · 2016