Legal Opinion

Lavey v. Kroger

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided July 28, 2011No. SC S059447PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLandau, J.

Petitioners seek review of the Attorney General’s certified ballot title for Initiative Petition 16 (2012), arguing that the ballot title does not satisfy the requirements of ORS 250.035(2). See ORS 250.085(2) (specifying requirements for seeking review of certified ballot titles). We review a certified ballot title to determine whether it substantially complies with those statutory requirements. See ORS 250.085(5) (stating standard of review). For the reasons that follow, we refer the ballot title to the Attorney General for modification.

Initiative Petition 16, a copy of which is attached as…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Kain/Waller v. MyersOregon Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Greene v. KulongoskiOregon Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Rasmussen v. KrogerOregon Supreme Court · 2011
  4. Whitsett v. KrogerOregon Supreme Court · 2010
  5. Caruthers v. MyersOregon Supreme Court · 2008

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. McCann / Harmon v. RosenblumOregon Supreme Court · 2014
  2. Blosser/Romain v. Rosenblum (IP 45)Oregon Supreme Court · 2015
  3. Markley v. RosenblumOregon Supreme Court · 2018
  4. Vaandering v. RosenblumOregon Supreme Court · 2016
  5. Dixon / Frohnmayer v. RosenblumOregon Supreme Court · 2014

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API