Legal Opinion

Cross v. Rosenblum

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided April 21, 2016No. SC S063863PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWalters, J.

Petitioners seek review of the Attorney General’s certified ballot title for Initiative Petition 61 (2016) (IP 61), arguing that the ballot title does not satisfy the requirements of ORS 250.035. We review a certified ballot title to determine whether it substantially complies with those statutory requirements. See ORS 250.085(5) (stating standard of review). For the reasons that follow, we refer the ballot title to the Attorney General for modification.

IP 61 has three sections. Section 1 provides: “No public funds shall be used to pay for any abortion, except when medically necessary or as…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Planned Parenthood Ass'n v. Department of Human ResourcesOregon Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Fred Meyer, Inc. v. RobertsOregon Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Kain/Waller v. MyersOregon Supreme Court · 2004
  4. Novick/Crew v. MyersOregon Supreme Court · 2004
  5. Planned Parenthood Ass'n v. Department of Human ResourcesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1983

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Fletchall v. RosenblumOregon Supreme Court · 2019
  2. Wilhelms v. RosenblumOregon Supreme Court · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API