Abood v. Detroit Board of Education
Supreme Court of the United States
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Stewart
The State of Michigan has enacted legislation authorizing a system for union representation of local governmental employees. A union and a local government employer are specifically permitted to agree to an “agency shop” arrangement, whereby every employee represented by a union— even though not a union member — must pay to the union, as a condition of employment, a service fee equal in amount to union dues. The issue before us is whether this arrangement violates the constitutional rights of government employees who object to public-sector unions as such or to various union activities…
2Cases cited64 opinions
- Pickering v. Board of Ed. of Township High School Dist. 205, Will Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Perry v. SindermannSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Buckley v. ValeoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Elrod v. BurnsSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Vaca v. SipesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1,154 opinions
- Perry Education Ass'n v. Perry Local Educators' Ass'nSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Members of the City Council of Los Angeles v. Taxpayers for VincentSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Roberts v. United States JayceesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Rosenberger v. Rector & Visitors of University of VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- T.W. Electrical Service, Inc. v. Pacific Electrical Contractors Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
1,149 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.