Legal Opinion

Lutz v. Rosenblum

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided March 22, 2018No. SC S065493 (Control); SC S065495PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtFlynn, J.

**653Two sets of petitioners have challenged the Attorney General's certified ballot title for Initiative Petition 33 (2018) (IP 33). If adopted, IP 33 would require that "government employee unions"1 annually report the following information to the Secretary of State:

"[H]ow dues are spent and recipients of such dues, including:
"(a) total amount of all dues collected by the government employee union;
"(b) contributions made by the government employee union to political committees, petition committees, and independent expenditures;
"(c) expenses paid by the government employee union that the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Abood v. Detroit Board of EducationSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  2. Chicago Teachers Union, Local No. 1 v. HudsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Fred Meyer, Inc. v. RobertsOregon Supreme Court · 1989
  4. Novick/Crew v. MyersOregon Supreme Court · 2004
  5. Rasmussen v. KrogerOregon Supreme Court · 2011

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Parrish v. RosenblumOregon Supreme Court · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API