Legal Opinion

Pitcher v. Ravven

Washington Supreme Court

Decided January 12, 1926No. 19380. Department TwoPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMain, J.

These two cases in the superior court were consolidated for trial. The purpose of the action of F. B. Pitcher and wife was to qniet title to certain real property. The active defendants in that action and the plaintiff in the other action claimed liens for either labor or material furnished and sought foreclosure of the same. The trial court entered a judgment quieting the title in the plaintiffs Pitcher and wife, and disallowed all lien claims. From this judgment, the defendants Walworth Manufacturing Company, a corporation, and A. F, Marvin appeal.

The facts are these: The respondents were…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Northwest Bridge Co. v. Tacoma Shipbuilding Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1904
  2. Bell v. GrovesWashington Supreme Court · 1899
  3. Dahlman v. ThomasWashington Supreme Court · 1915
  4. Long v. McAvoyWashington Supreme Court · 1925
  5. National Lumber Co. v. WhalleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Finos v. Netherlands American Mortgage BankWashington Supreme Court · 1928
  2. Ketner Bros., Inc. v. NicholsWashington Supreme Court · 1958
  3. Newell v. VervaekeWashington Supreme Court · 1937
  4. Fergusson v. GuyWashington Supreme Court · 1929

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API