National Lumber Co. v. Whalley
California Supreme Court
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County and from an order refusing a new trial. George H. Hutton, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtHenshaw, J.
This is an action brought to foreclose a materialman’s lien, plaintiff alleging that one Whalley was the owner and reputed owner of the land upon which the dwelling-house was built, and that it furnished lumber to him, at his special instance and request, to the value of $676.98. The answer of the Merchants’ Trust Company denied that Whalley was the owner or reputed owner, alleged ownership in itself, and set out as a separate defense that it posted the written notice of non-responsibility contemplated by section 1192 of the Code of Civil Procedure, within ten days after it had knowledge that…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Savings & Loan Society v. BurnettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
- Santa Monica Lumber & Mill Co. v. HegeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
- Comptoir D'Escompte De Paris v. DresbachCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
- Prouty v. DevinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
- Hines v. MillerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Hammond Lumber Co. v. Richardson Bldg. & Eng'g Co.California Supreme Court · 1930
- Lorenz v. RousseauCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927
- Giant Powder Co. v. Fidelity & Deposit Co.California Supreme Court · 1932
- Pitcher v. RavvenWashington Supreme Court · 1926
- Llewellyn Iron Works v. ReedCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.