Legal Opinion

Dahlman v. Thomas

Washington Supreme Court

Decided December 18, 1915No. 12890PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Cross-appeals from a judgment of the superior court for Whatcom county, Hardin, J., entered January 22, 1915, upon findings in favor of the plaintiffs, in an action to foreclose a mechanics’ lien, tried to the court.

1Opinion of the CourtBausman, J.

Action for the foreclosure of miners’ liens under Rem. & Bal. Code, § 1129 (P. C. 309 § 53), against the Mount Baker Mining Company, owner of the land, and Boundary Gold, a corporation having, by assignment from defendants Thomas and Clark, a contract right to purchase the property from the owner. The lower court allowed the *654Kens against the interest of Boundary Gold, but not against the Mt. Baker Company’s, entering personal judgment at the same time against Thomas and Clark. Neither Boundary Gold nor the Mt. Baker Company appealed. Thomas and Clark did appeal, and the plaintiffs prosecute a…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Henderson v. ConnellyIllinois Supreme Court · 1887
  2. Bohn Manufacturing Co. v. KountzeNebraska Supreme Court · 1890
  3. Hill v. GillSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1889
  4. Stetson-Post Mill Co. v. BrownWashington Supreme Court · 1899
  5. Shapleigh v. HullSupreme Court of Colorado · 1895

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Milner v. ShueyNevada Supreme Court · 1936
  2. Finos v. Netherlands American Mortgage BankWashington Supreme Court · 1928
  3. Seattle Lighting Fixture Co. v. Broadway Central Market, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1930
  4. Gehr v. Ferry CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1934
  5. Newell v. VervaekeWashington Supreme Court · 1937

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API